Notes on:
Ghosn, C. (2002). “Saving the Business Without Losing the Company.” Harvard Business Review, January 2002, p 37-45.
- Intro
- Renault Nissan Merger
- Ghosn natural candidate
- Cleaned up failed merger with Volvo
- Nissan unprofitable for 8 yrs
- “do-or-die situation” (p 38)
- retain self-esteem of employees
- Plan
- involve Nissan’s own managers
- Cross-functional teams
- company culture important
- develop new culture
- Breaking with Tradition
- Historically, product dev lessened to save money
- No seniority rule
- Sometimes younger managers suffer
- New performance-based compensation
- historically, loose areas of responsibility
- positions with no responsibility
- Mobilizing Cross-Functional Teams
- Dramatic changes
- Went against some norms of Japanese society
- Cross-functional teams were primary part of plan
- Given 3 months to come up with turnaround recommendations
- Came from company’s middle managers
- Each CFT had subteams
- Executive sponsors from different business areas
- Pilots with frontline experience and credibility with rank and file
- Challenge to reduce costs by 20%
- Identified many small changes to reduce costs
- Nissan Revival Plan, developed by Nissan’s own executives
- Plan was about braking, and accelerating the company
- The Importance of Respect
- Uneasy public
- Employees trusted Ghosn b/c of respect he showed
- “careful to protect Nissan’s identity and its dignity as a company” (p 44)
- Renault did not try to renegotiate terms
- Nissan’s culture more impt than Japanese culture